House Republicans Slash Billions From Climate Programs In Controversial Budget Plan

House Republicans are taking an axe to climate programs. Their new budget proposal aims to claw back a whopping $6.5 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act‘s climate initiatives. It’s a dramatic rollback that targets everything from the Department of Energy’s Loans Program Office to the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.

The GOP plan doesn’t stop there. It calls for gutting the EPA’s budget by 55%, slashing it down to a mere $4.2 billion. Imagine running a national environmental agency on what some companies spend on office snacks.

They’re also eyeing $15 billion in cuts from clean energy projects authorized under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, plus another $6 billion from electric vehicle charging networks. The party-line megabill will create over $900 billion in savings overall if passed.

States will feel the pain directly. Federal support for state-level climate strategies? Going, going, gone. Research grants, environmental justice programs, NOAA climate research—all on the chopping block. Local governments planning climate initiatives might want to check their backup plans.

Republican leadership has a simple explanation: voters don’t want “extreme left-wing” climate policy. They’re framing these cuts as rescinding “reckless” spending from the “misnamed” Inflation Reduction Act. Fiscal discipline, they claim. Because nothing says responsible budgeting like ignoring the planet’s fever.

The damage is extensive. Nine IRA renewable energy and electrification subsidy programs will see their funding vanish. Programs supporting battery technology and clean infrastructure? Not spared.

The total nondefense funding cut reaches $15 billion in their full-year continuing resolution.

Republicans are positioning this as part of broader budget reforms for deficit reduction. This approach aligns with the energy realism perspective that questions the economic viability of rapid renewable transitions. Their strategy aligns with other healthcare cuts that could leave millions uninsured under proposed Medicaid work requirements. They’re specifically targeting what they call funding for “niche” organizations and “ideological” programs.

For climate advocates, it’s a nightmare scenario. For Republican leaders, it’s a return to what they’re calling “sensible policy.” One thing’s clear: the climate will be paying interest on these budget savings for generations.